;)
Shootout At the Camelot Corral-Part 2: Mental Hate Crime
Tuesday, February 14, 2012 at 11:06PM Related: Shootout At the Camelot Corral-February 10, 2012
The Bill Wood Disclosures:
I have now gone through nearly 12 hours of the audio, and the video of the first interview, with Bill Wood from Project Camelot...some of these twice! I have witheld any substanitive judgements of the level of information provided in those interviews, but have commented on the hubris surrounding the "Beyond Looking Glass" marketing campaign launched by Camelot to feature the interviews on their site.
Even as the videos went viral, it was clear that Kerry Cassidy was unhappy with Bill's performance, so much so that David Wilcock was brought in to shore up the shaky foundations. The problem lies, not in the information Bill Wood provided, but in what was EXPECTED by both the collective of Project Camelot and the audience. Forget for now, the accusations that Brockbrader/Wood was not a SEAL and that he is a registered sex offender...those issues are dealt with effectively on both sides. Forget that when the third Camelot video became an expose of sex rings in Las vegas and a platform for Bill's spiritual pursuit, Wood was "lynched" via chatroom comments. As I said, I have refrained from any comments until I have spoken with Bill Wood, personally.
What IS clear is that Bill Wood failed to provide the level of "sizzle" required for a whistleblower on Project Camelot. So, Wood was thrown under the bus by Cassidy because he failed to live up to the hype promised by Camelot, who of late have a shortfall of new dislosers. Cassidy's pale "love and light" veneer gave way to outright denunciation after Wood issued some corrections is his subsequent interview with Lisa Harrison on February 7, 2012.
In an email to which I was a recipient, Bill attached a lenghty statement dealing with both substanitive issues and the heightening war of words with Kerry Cassidy. The full statement is posted below as a PDF. What follows is Kerry's reply, and my commments to her recent actions, focusing on her repeated undermining of people with which she has conflict, by invoking a "mind control" epithet.
More Truth Revealed by Bill Brockbrader.pdf
UNDERSTAND THIS:
Mind control, "programming" and other similar terms are MEMES...repeated and regurgitated throughout the internet media, removed from their context. They also act as TRIGGERS for both the victims, and those distinctive varieties of trolls who habituate forums, talk show chatrooms, and blog comments.
The act of bandying these terms around in loose fashion, especially as a means of discrediting a subject is nothing less than a form of mental hate crime! Like racial epithets, gender-based slurs, or derogatory comments on the disabled, the usage of "mind control" and its associated terms as an implied negative character disorder, desensitizes the public perception of these hideous practices, and minimizes the trauma of its victims in favor of a broader, more pragmatic usage to the detriment of everyone who works to END FOREVER these practices.
As I outline below, if Ms. Cassidy wishes to denounce Bill Wood as a "liar", that is her perogative. The term is fairly clear, and perhaps applicable where two parties vary on details. Lies can be addressed in a substantive manner by the readers and listeners with the proper degree of discernment...the world if FULL of liars.
On the other hand, mind control must be understood as a syndrome of violence to the human soul and psyche. In extremis, it is a violent, brutal, and devastating process that strips the subjects abilities to recall or assess their own thoughts and actions. Mind control subjects are VICTIMS...not liars, in the capacity of their particular testimony. Anyone who has ever spent time interviewing subjects of mind control (including abductees), fully knows the precarious nature of both the psyche and the testimony being given.
These factors make any such interview a matter of delicacy and great sensitivity. That sensitivity must never be over-ridden by the subjective whims of the interviewer, or audience, regarding the subjects' moral intentions. To be more succinct: lies are purposeful distortions; mind control is a subjegation of willful response and action. The two are not morally equal, and the latter is involuntary.
As a publicly denounced "liar", Bill Wood should have slunk away. He did not do so, and in fact, roared back with a level statement on the differences with Camelot, the war of words with Navy SEAL, Don Shipley, and an offer of validation by a former SEAL trainer who recalled both Wood and Blackwater founder, Erik Prince.
Cassidy, understandably upset (but with no small blame to bear due to her ungraceful handling of the entire Bill Wood debacle), shot back with one phrase that once again demonstrated a lack of integrity as regards the subject of MIND CONTROL:
Feb 13
For those who are not familiar with Cassidy's prior attempts to smear someone with the "mind control" label I refer you to the article here: Letter To Kerry Cassidy-December 5, 2011 What follows is my response to Cassidy's latest drive-by mind control attack:
Randy Maugans
Feb 13
to KERRY, Bill, ...
We have Bill's written statement, and Kerry's blog article, we are all grown-ups, let those with ears hear. I have an issue with Kerry---a pattern if you will, that persists: whenever someone turns on her, or those on the INSIDE of Project Camelot, she reverts to accusations of mind control, as she does in both her posts and this email regarding Bill Wood. She did this in the accusations made against Richard Hoagland by Gary Vierre back in December 2011, when she wrote that Gary was likely a mind control subject.
I would have to ask you, Kerry, what substantive evidence do you have that Bill has been "re-programmed"? What evidence did you ever have about your cruel accusations against Gary---a person with which you had NO contact?
You may ask why this matters?
Again, it goes to the very core of the work you and Bill did in Project Camelot's early days with whistleblowers who were generally assumed to be both handled, and subjects of some form of mind control. You have had witnesses who acknowledge they are being handled...Barry King comes to mind, as he told me directly he is still handled.
The problem is one of deploying convenient pejorative labels whenever things turn to shit on your end. So I ask: is being a "mind control" subject a descriptor of a person who is to be treated with compassion, or derision? I don't think you can have it both ways. If you choose the negative connotation (and you have), then you place into disrepute not only those you have so labelled, but your own "body of evidence", and any such future endeavors.
That those coming out of such projects are subject to surveillance, handling (direct or indirect), and even ultimately being "switched" should not come as a surprise to you, a veteran researcher of these subjects. That you have a repeated pattern of such behavior demonstrates either a double standard towards such subjects, or a naïveté beyond your experience.
It appears this is your last resort epithet when all else has failed. In a sense, you, being a researcher of mind control, employ mind control by invoking mind control---even where a lack of such is absent. You wonder why your whistleblowers are drying up? Do you not sense that even your own audience is growing fatigued with your sharp elbows and tactless manner in attempting to pry the last ounce of substance from your victims (er, interview subjects)?
I think you have fairly stated that Bill's testimony was not in line with your standards in this statement:
"...a lack of familiarity with what Project Camelot is all about. And therefore Bill and Eva are not able to assess accurately what is new and what is well known to the Camelot audience."
You also seemed to evoke the proper tenor for a person in your field when you wrote:
"I suggest that rather than judging him you consider the impact that simple mass mind control has had on your own lives and then try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who has that and on top of it joins the military and becomes the focus of intense mind manipulation over long periods of time. Then you will begin to understand what it truly means to be a whistleblower, or someone who has chosen to break ranks and come forward to tell the truth about what they have experienced."
That was then, this is now. So there are double standards, or what we would call "conditional love"....nice!
In your haste to rush out the Bill Wood material, did you ever vet his testimony? Did it occur to you that the fact he presented material similar to other whistelblowers was to be considered more "corroborative" than the stunning next big thing that your (perceived) adrenaline-addicted listenership demands? Part of the art of media is knowing how to frame things, and present in a manner appropriate to the presenter. When the first interview failed to yield the appropriate "buzz", did you really need three people to handle a second interview...or is this just Camelot's manner of "handling" a subject?
Kerry, you have a problem: you are completely disingenuous about mind control. IF...I repeat...IF, Bill has been "reprogrammed", then he would not be the culprit, but those who are his handlers. On the other hand, if "mind controlled" "reprogrammed", or other similar terms are to be bandied about in hostility and anger, then it can be presumed you lack the appropriate insight and sensitivity to work with such people.
I suspect those who have watched these repeated "blow ups", especially witnesses presently not coming forward, are also seeing the big picture in this regard. I suggest you clarify your perceptions and responses with an attunement of sensitivity toward subjects of mind control programs, and resist taking (once again) the "low road" when things go bad.
Grace under pressure is the real sign of a professional...not the name-calling and hurled implications which you cannot know or prove.
Randy Maugans-OffPlanet Radio
"I would only suggest that, as Kerry states, that Project Camelot is not the proper forum for first time whistleblowers and that many people, including myself, agree with her statement. It is my greatest wish to establish a forum in which whistleblowers can disclose seeming unbelievable information and not be discredited simply because they don’t possess a level of proof that nameless, faceless people in the chatrooms and forumsdemand."
I get a steady flow of emails form listeners and readers who voice concerns over the goings on at Camelot/Avalon, usually of the type that indicates they feel captive to the millieu of such turmoil. YOU HAVE A CHOICE: Dump them and begin to dig out the truth for yourselves! Camelot may be the "big dog" (for now) of truther-type media, but they are certainly not the only one.
In fact, be suspicious of "big dogs"---they are usually "well fed", if you catch the drift. Certainly, the tone of arrogance indicates that Kerry & Co. feel justified in deploying the mind control meme to their advantage whenever it suits them. That arrogance worries me...how about you?
Reader Comments (13)
From the outside looking in, I'm glad you're following up on this, Randy.
Camelot/Avalon is a total red herring, in my estimation, and I decided not to read anything about Wood/Brockbader episode from the beginning. My life is much richer for the choosing.
Well said Randy!
I agree that these issues should be handled with care, after all, if certain people are still being handled then their handlers know everything that is going on with that person and therefore always guiding the strings. After all, the programmer(s)/Handler(s) are very clever, very subtle, well trained and usually one step ahead.
I think that any platform like Camelot ( who have done some amazing work ) that has propelled someone into the spotlight, aggressively , then it can be a double edged sword. Most mind control victims have heavy isolation programming, so when this person is suddenly opened up to the general public ( who may or may not have been heavily programmed ) and 'Bull in a china shop' investigators start to probe and pull apart these subjects in front of thousands of people then it becomes an 'Atrocity Exhibition.
These mind control victims should be handled with care, public humiliation can be enough to push a healthy, strong minded person over the edge. Most of the mind controlled subjects have suicide programming and this appears to be often casually over looked. I have recoiled in astonishment at times hearing these people being interrogated because they are going "off topic" or because they may have contradicted themselves - these people live in contradiction - .
It is a real shame that when all this information became widely available and people were willing to speak out about this subject,it really felt that people were coming together offering support and sharing information to a wider audience that would really show the PTB that people were waking up.
Unfortunately it now appears that the PTB can sit back and watch certain Investigators and some of the so called 'truthers turn things into a serious joke, enough to turn the majority of people away.
Will Vanity and Public Profile be the downfall of "The Truth Movement".
I concur Randy...the little bits of truth sandwiched inbetween the loaves of bull do not sit well with me. I believe you are right that while interviewing whistleblowers, that may have been mind controlled, it is important to approach the subjects with sensitivity and care. Especially because we are all victims of mind control in varied degrees, so in order to uncover truth we need to be ever so considerate and caring with ourselves and others as we unwind truth from lies. Also we should all, as audience to these interviews, be very careful and use loads of discretion while taking in others' experiences...because...most of us get hung up on bullshit from time to time....based on how we would like things to be...not on the reality of the situation. That's why it is so easy for me to get sucked into the love in light group...because i just want everyone and everything to be NICE. But I'm learning that the things I really love and value in life don't just get handed to me...I have to work hard for it. much love....
Randy, I believe you are spot on in your assessment of the above styled disclosure "interview" (using this term a bit lightly). Anyone choosing to come forward with occulted knowledge or alphabet agency intel should be, not only heard in their entirety, but respected to a degree commensurate to someone sticking their neck out in any fashion. Although the Wood interview did not rise to the high profile level promised, albeit propagated for days on end via Camelot standards of practice, it should not have devolved to this. I was disappointed in Kerry's methodologies relative to the Woods contact, however I still respect the work she has done up to this point. As a caveat, the Camelot chatroom at the time of the Wood interview was likened to sharks feeding at night on a Florida beach. They seemed to have wanted more blood than dissernable data, and leaning towards base consciousness as a result.
Randy, I believe you are spot on in your assessment of the above styled disclosure "interview" (using this term a bit lightly). Anyone choosing to come forward with occulted knowledge or alphabet agency intel should be, not only heard in their entirety, but respected to a degree commensurate to someone sticking their neck out in any fashion. Although the Wood interview did not rise to the high profile level promised, albeit propagated for days on end via Camelot standards of practice, it should not have devolved to this. I was disappointed in Kerry's methodologies relative to the Woods contact, however I still respect the work she has done up to this point. As a caveat, the Camelot chatroom at the time of the Wood interview was likened to sharks feeding at night on a Florida beach. They seemed to have wanted more blood than dissernable data, and leaning towards base consciousness as a result.
Thank you Randy!!! When I was watching the third interview with Bill Wood and Kerry Cassidy, I was thinking exactly what you expressed. Having worked with children who have been traumatized, I know that such events can impact even the ability to process language and speak fluently, especially under stress. Kerry was ignoring some very valuable information the Bill Wood was expressing. What he had to say may not have been adrenalin rushing, but helps to build a solid understanding of the web of dark power that we face. I felt as if Kerry did not truly understand what had happened with the mind control of Bill Wood and that she lacked the patience to really understand. As far as her listeners are concerned, the facilitator of such a show has great power to create an atmosphere of compassion and true listening, and has the power to gently guide responses. There is no need for the type of abrasiveness that she has demonstrated and I think I shall begin to ignore her work at this point. If we cannot even listen with compassion, then what good is all of this? EVEN IF someone is not telling the truth (and I am NOT saying that about Bill Wood), we still must listen well. If we are not even doing that, how can we begin to get to the truth? Thank you.
nice article randy. but i still think he was being a pussy. he didnt say anything new. theres like 100 people out there saying the same thing. this clown better come with some real information. something nobody has heard yet. im not going to waste my time with some dude who thinks this is some kind of joke. some of us take this information stuff seriously. it not about kerry, or bill woods or project camelot or whatever. its about the information. so please, if they want the platform, make sure you got your shit together.
I gave up on Avalon/Camelot when they were promoting Hoagland and Falkov amongst others total shills if ever I heard any plus there were others, and the bleats for donations to go to India - Egypt - Africa + wherever. Actually I do donate to sites that I think might be useful but never to brashy interviewers who think that 'camelot listeners' "will know all that" haha....
Let's be really truthful and say she's been a bully at times...over-talks her guests, can be condescending, and just plain not kind or professional. Lets invite Love and Compassion to be her constant companion so she may find her way home soon.
I found Kerry's manner with Bill was rather intimidating and at time abrupt and rude. My instinct tells me that Bill is truthful. I am sad that his first foray out into the alternative media was from Project Camelot, to me they are not a credible organisation due to the persona of Kerry. To me it is obvious she has to do some self development and inner looking. We attack when we are not at ease in our own skins.
thank you randy for standing up against abusive and insensitive interviewers. if i was a whistle blower, project camelot would be the very last place i would consider spilling the beans. i have been watching and listening to kerry for 3 years now and have gained incredible insight into the secret workings of our government and the off planet races they have been working with. but as of late, i have not been able to support her work, simply because she is so incredibly rude to her guests. she did a second interview with john kettler and threw him under the bus like she did with bill wood. i think kerry needs to step back, turn off the donate button and become a human being again.
I had the same thoughts as 'jane' above when she stated: "I found Kerry's manner with Bill was rather intimidating and at time abrupt and rude. My instinct tells me that Bill is truthful. I am sad that his first foray out into the alternative media was from Project Camelot, to me they are not a credible organisation due to the persona of Kerry. To me it is obvious she has to do some self development and inner looking. We attack when we are not at ease in our own skins."
I have a website where I 'compile' information to expose the US Administration policy to create terror in the Middle East, and thus divide and conquer. Bill Wood's first interview was another 'piece' to the puzzle. I have discovered lots of those pieces. It is necessary to have the researched material if one is serious about discovering the real issues and challenges we are faced with today.
You may do an internet search on the title:
US Soldiers Ordered to Kill Civilians and Innocents
Sometimes it only takes a few courageous individuals to come forward with their personal story, in order to provide the catalyst which may shift the perspectives of millions of 'indoctrinated' fellow North Americans.
I cannot listen to Kerry Cassidy's interviews for very long, as I quickly tire of cringing so much. Not so much at her unprofessional interviewing style or disrespect toward her interviewees, but because I can feel the hurt in her. She is very angry, this alone narrows her focus, narrows her perspective. Her heart is not open; her mind is closed.
After watching her totally disrespect Dr. Steven Greer, I decided I did not need to watch her anymore, but when she interviewed Bob Dean together with Clifford Stone in March 2012, I really wanted to hear about Dean's extended NDE experience.
It was during this interview that it became clear to me what Cassidy is so angry about. After knowing so many abductees it became clear to me that's what happened to Cassidy as well, although this is only my intuitive feeling. I have no idea whether she is aware of this or not. Regardless, I send her Light & Love, and I let her Higher Self know that, when she is ready, she can be cleared, and I know who can do it.
The frequencies are tough right now, forcing a lot to the surface to be dealt with. I had a feeling Cassidy would come to the point where she would face all the negative energy she assaulted onto others, not that I believe so much in karma or anything, but I do believe in Critical Mass.
I pray and intend that all of us who are God's creation get through this time of clearing with as much Grace and patience as we can muster. The more we resist this clearing process, the more difficult it is. The more we let it flow, the faster it will be completed.
Namaste'